|

Mayor Newsom Should Implement a Zero-Based
Budget Plan
Hans Hansson - Starboard TCN Worldwide Real Estate
May 27, 2004
News that San Francisco has the highest percentage
of city workers to its population does not come as a shock to long-time
San Francisco residents. With 35 employees for every 1,000 citizens,
San Francisco has more than twice as many employees as Philadelphia
(16 per 1,000) and even more than New York (31 per 1,000).
Since Republican John Barbagelata lost the mayoral
race to George Moscone in 1975, the mayor of San Francisco has not
faced opposition from another political party, as the city seems
to be a single party town - Democratic. All political opposition
has been within the governing mayors own ranks. Since 1975,
every mayor had expanded government by awarding his or her supporters
with jobs, bloating the city government and its budget.
It would be one thing if all these employees reflected
overall improved services and a solid, well-maintained city infrastructure,
but this is not the case. Every city department is a living example
of waste and inefficiency.
With San Francisco facing a major budget crisis,
Mayor Gavin Newsome needs to streamline the work force and create
efficiency standards for every city department. To do this, the
he should consider zero-based budgeting. Under zero-based budgeting,
every department starts with a zero budget and rebuilds itself from
zero by looking at benefits versus costs to determine end budget
requirements. By implementing zero-based budgeting, every department
will be forced to prove its worth to our city.
Each department should be independently audited
to ensure that political favoritism is taken out of the budgetary
process. One cannot assume that each department is needed and that
a new budget is accurate simply by applying a C.P.I (Consumer Price
Index) factor to the budget each year.
Implementing zero-based budgeting would be a bold
but necessary step for Mayor Newsom to take. He would face a strong
outcry from every city department, as well as the strong civil services
unions, which will fight to keep the status quo and argue for more
workers and extended benefits. Yet, the benefits of implementing
such a programenhanced and streamlined efficiencywould
far outweigh the costs the mayor would face.
|